Easy way to back up CF formats

I’m working on an application that Project Managers use to test their competencies against a competency framework. There’s a lot of questions and I don’t want to freak them out by showing all at once, so I use Conditional Formatting to unhide the questions in batches, as well as to highlight the next thing that needs to be answered, and to show how their self assessment corresponds to the ratings key.

Here’s how it looks before users start filling it out: only the first batch of questions relating to the first competency area are displayed:
Comp blank_Small
As they complete it, their answers get color-coded to match the key:
Comp Partial_Small
When they complete the last question in regards to the current competency they’re working on, the next batch of questions for the next competency appears, and the definition for that competency overwrites the previous one in the top left:
Comp next_Small

I’m using CF because I don’t want to use code to do this if I can help it, so I don’t have to deal with security settings or questions about enabling macros. Plus I’m just there for 4 weeks, and there isn’t going to be a VBA developer picking up the project after me.

But the CF dialog – how shall I put this delicately – seems as if it was built by Microsoft. (Ok, so I threw tact to the wind there. It’s a dog, a pig, and a slug, all rolled into one needy, dirty, slimy son-of-a-bitch pest.) Here’s all it shows me in all of its non-resizable gory. (Yes, gory, not glory.):
CF Manager
Using it is like trying to build a ship in a bottle inside of another ship in a bottle. Now I know how proctologists feel. If it was half the dialog box that the Name Manager was, it would at least yet you resize so you could see all your conditions at once:
Slightly better
Just look what the Name Manager gives us, by way of comparison:
Name Manager
The Name Manager gives us friendly names, notes where we can record what does what, resizable columns, and a resizable dialog. Compared to that, the CF dialog is like the punchline from a Monty Python skit.

“Oh, we used to dream of having a resizable dialog box.”
What’s worse, I keep noticing that the order of my CF conditions gets scrambled – maybe when I copy the sheet to a new template, maybe when I insert or delete columns, maybe when I don’t look suitably impressed whenever it does work correctly. I don’t know.

So I thought I’d look for a way to back them up. I looked at Dicks’ posts Listing Format Conditions and Listing Format Conditions Redux, but those would need more work still in order to record the formatting, and then a routine to restore everything from the storage table.

But then I discovered this: If you fire up the macro recorder, bring up the CF dialog box, select Manage Rules, select Show formatting rules for This Worksheet, and then makes some trivial change – such as click the down arrow to move the currently selected CF condition down one, then click the up arrow to put it back:
CF Manager_Move
…then as soon as you push OK the Macro Recorder spits out a macro that clears all the format conditions on the entire sheet, and then builds those CF rules again from scratch. All of them. Here’s an excerpt:

Sub Macro7()
Range("PM[Definition " & Chr(10) & "(Experience)]").Select
Selection.FormatConditions.Add Type:=xlExpression, Formula1:= _
With Selection.FormatConditions(1).Font
.ThemeColor = xlThemeColorDark1
.TintAndShade = 0
End With
Selection.FormatConditions(1).StopIfTrue = True
Range("PM[Definition " & Chr(10) & "(Knowledge)]").Select
Selection.FormatConditions.Add Type:=xlExpression, Formula1:= _
With Selection.FormatConditions(1).Interior
.PatternColorIndex = xlAutomatic
.ThemeColor = xlThemeColorDark1
.TintAndShade = 0
End With
Selection.FormatConditions(1).StopIfTrue = True

End Sub

That – my friend – is your CF backup. The only thing wrong with this code is that it keeps putting the line Range(“G14”).Activate in the middle of each block for some strange reason. That happened to be the cell I had selected when I recorded the macro. But if you do a find and replace on the code to ditch it in favor of a more helpful “” then the code works fine. (Yes I know that CF is relative, but that’s still no reason why it should select the cell I have selected and then apply the formatting to it rather than to the desired target). (Edit: You need this activation if you are dealing with CF conditions with relative referencing. But it doesn’t work properly in the event that you originally applied CF to a range while you had another range outside of that CF area selected. The CF manager takes account of this properly, but the macro output doesn’t, meaning it selects a range, then activates a cell/range outside of that selection, which screws things up. So it pays to eyeball the code for situations like this.)

Now what would be cool is if someone out there was to code up a routine that uses extensibility to read this from the VBE and populate a handy table in the worksheet with all the parameters. Extra credit to someone who devises a way to make the macro recorder fire up and do this automatically for each sheet.

Even better: it would be amazing if Microsoft would show the CF dialog the slightest amount of love. CF could be one of the most powerful features of Excel for non coders. But not as it stands at the moment. Right now, it’s a pigdogslug.

An even easier way

So I got to thinking that if Excel will quickly spit out a complete list of FormatConditions at the ‘AppliesTo’ level for the sheet, it must have them stored in a collection somewhere. And that collection is…drum roll please…the Cells object.

Want some code to quickly and easily print out every format condition everywhere? Here ’tis:

Sub FindCF()

'We have to Dim WhatIsIt as a generic Object instead of declaring as FormatCondition because DataBars screw things up.
'See http://excelmatters.com/2015/03/04/when-is-a-formatcondition-not-a-formatcondition/

Dim WhatIsIt As Object
Dim fc As FormatCondition
Dim db As Databar
Dim cs As ColorScale
Dim ics As IconSetCondition

Dim ws As Worksheet
For Each ws In ActiveWorkbook.Worksheets
For Each WhatIsIt In ws.Cells.FormatConditions
Select Case TypeName(WhatIsIt)
Case "Databar":
Set db = WhatIsIt
Debug.Print "Type: " & "DataBar" & vbTab & "Applies To: " & db.AppliesTo.Address
Case "FormatCondition"
Set fc = WhatIsIt
Debug.Print "Type: " & "FormatCondition" & vbTab & "Applies To: " & fc.AppliesTo.Address & vbTab & "Formula: " & fc.Formula1
Case "ColorScale"
Set cs = WhatIsIt
Debug.Print "Type: " & "ColorScale" & vbTab & "Applies To: " & cs.AppliesTo.Address
Case "IconSetCondition"
Set ics = WhatIsIt
Debug.Print "Type: " & "IconSet" & vbTab & "Applies To: " & ics.AppliesTo.Address
Case Else
End Select
Next WhatIsIt
Next ws
End Sub

Code? Luxury!

Global name meets Local, Global freaks out

So here’s something I came across today. Somehow I’d managed to set up both local AND global names in a sheet, and found that I pretty much couldn’t do anything with the Global name via VBA as a result.

Say I set up this global name:
SomeName - Global
Note that it says SomeName in the NameBox when I have the name selected. Nothing weird about that.

Now I add a local name with the same name, pointing to A2:
SomeName - Local
…and here you can see both names in the Name Manager. Note that it says SomeName in the NameBox when I have the local name selected. Nothing weird about that, either…local names take precedence over global.

SomeName - Both_Name Manager
If I type = then select A1 where the global name lives, note that no name comes up in the intellisense:
Equals Global
..but if I do the same with the local name, I get intellisense:
Equals Local
Now things get a little weirder. If I type =SomeName, I get two options in the intellisense:
Equals SomeName
If I select the SomeName (Workbook) option, Excel qualifies the reference with the workbook name:
Book2 SomeName
…but when I push Enter, it’s still the local name that’s being referenced:
Book2 SomeName Not
…and when I select it again, I see that Excel has bizarrely changed that Book1! qualifier to a Sheet1! qualifier. In other words, it’s said ‘I know you asked for workbook, but I’m giving you local’:
Book2 SomeName Local Qualifier
So what the hell is the point of those two options in the intellisense, if no matter what you do, Excel gives you the local name? Beats me. What’s worse, if your workbook name has a space in it, then Excel forgets to wrap apostrophes around it, and the Update Values dialog comes up:
Update Values dialog
What a mess. Push cancel, and you’re left with an invalid name:
Book2 SomeName spaces

Names and Collections

It turns out that the local name gets added to both the ActiveWorkbook.Names collection AND the ActiveSheet.Names Collection:
? activeworkbook.Names.Count
? activesheet.names.count

You can reference both names by index number just fine:
? activeworkbook.Names(1).Name
? activeworkbook.Names(2).Name

…but any attempt to reference the globally scoped one by name gives you the local name. Here, I retrieve their names from their index numbers:
? activeworkbook.Names(1).Name
? activeworkbook.Names(2).Name

Here I retrieve their refersto ranges from those index numbers:
? activeworkbook.Names(1).RefersTo
? activeworkbook.Names(2).RefersTo

Here I try to retrieve their refersto ranges from their names:
? activeworkbook.Names(“Sheet1!SomeName”).RefersTo
? activeworkbook.Names(“SomeName”).RefersTo

And here I try to retrieve their names from their names:
? activeworkbook.Names(“Sheet1!SomeName”).Name
? activeworkbook.Names(“SomeName”).Name

As per this Stack Overflow thread, If you want to identify the global one, you have to loop through the collection of names and find the one that has an “!” in its name.

So there you have it: if you’re referencing names by name, don’t assume you’ll get the one you want. Tedious!

CF meets Paste Names, CF freaks out.

Here’s a funny little bug I came across today. So I’m adding a CF condition, and I push F3 to bring up Paste Names rather than type out a reference or name:
And clicking on that named range duly inserts it into my CF formula:
…but the only problem is, now I can’t seem to do anything else. I can’t type the closing bracket, because Excel won’t let me. I can’t backspace to remove the offending name, because Excel won’t let me. The cursor is still flashing, so Excel hasn’t hung.

If you type the name in manually rather than using F3, it works perfectly. It turns out its some kind of focus issue: if you push ALT + TAB the screen flickers, but you still have the Conditional Format dialog open and now it works perfectly.

It’s incredible what you can do with CF if you’ve got a good memory. The good memory bit is required because CF doesn’t let you write notes about what each condition does like Names do, or even assign those CF conditions meaningful names. Let alone (heaven forbid) resize the dialog box so you can see all your rules at once, to help you work out which does what:
CF dialog
With a good memory, it’s an incredibly strong and useful tool. With my memory, it’s downright mysterious.

Shame, because I’m using it to really good effect to steer users through a pretty complicated self-assessment tool. I pity the poor sap that comes after me that has to amend these rules. On the other hand, that poor sap will probably end up hiring me back at my urgent pickle rate. Thanks, Microsoft.

CellAbove trick no longer needed?

I was writing up the CellAbove trick for the book. You know, the trick outlined at Ken Puls’ place.

First I was going to show how SUM doesn’t handle row insertions immediately above the SUM function itself. So I duly made up a crappy example (if you’ll pardon the crappy pun):
Underwear 1
…and then did the screenshot of the row insert, that showed how the formula didn’t adjust:
Underwear 2
…and then went to add some ridiculously large number of underwear, for readers who need some point laboring:
Underwear 3
…and then pushed enter, and to my amazement saw that my example of “broken” ain’t, no more:
Underwear 4
How utterly inconsiderate of Microsoft to fix this. Ruined a perfectly good example that I figure I could have dragged out for another half a chapter. Bugger! Now I have to write something else. God I hope they don’t fix the CONCATENATE function before I finish the book, or I’m screwed.


I just heard from Bill Jelen, who mentions when this gets autocorrected in this really great podcast of his:

He says “Going back to Excel 2003, provided you have a series of three or more numbers, Excel’s going to rewrite the formula to handle the new rows”.

But do check out that link: It’s hilarious. Also check out the follow-up podcasts.

There’s nothing like an Excel nerd with too much time on his hands…

Timing Formulas

In my last post, I looked at how much faster the Double VLOOKUP trick was on sorted data compared with the usual linear VLOOKUP on unsorted data.

Below is the code for the timing routine I use. I stole the guts of it from joeu2004 who made some incredibly insightful comments at this great thread at MrExcel

If you’re going to time formulas, then that thread is required reading, because it makes this important point: we cannot always accurately measure the performance of a formula simply by measuring one instance of it. (But that does depend on the nature of the formula and the situation that we are trying to measure. Sometimes we need to measure one instance of a formula, but increase the size of ranges that it references in order to overcome the effects of overhead.)

I’ve assigned my code to a custom button in the ribbon. You just select the cells you want the formula to time, and click the button. (By the way, my upcoming book not only shows you how to do this, but also gives you routines for every one of the icons shown above and a lot more besides.)
TimeFormulas 1
In the above case, I’ve selected a 1 row by 3 column range. If your selection is only one row deep – and there’s more rows with data below – then the app assumes you want to time everything below too, up to the first blank cell it encounters. I may want to rethink that, but it works good for now.

And after I click the magic button, here’s the result:
Timing message
As you can see from the output screenshot above, it puts a new table in a new sheet, populates it with your timings and relevant parameters, and then displays a message with joeu2004’s warning in it. Plus – and I think this is the genius part – it lets you push OK to return back to the sheet where the original formulas are, or push Cancel if you want to stay in the output sheet.

Note the ‘Formula’ column in the output table. For now, it just lists the formula that was in the top-left cell in the user’s selection. I think listing multiple formulas would be overkill. If there’s no formula in the top left cell, it sees if there’s a formula in the cell below. That way you can select headers in a Table, and you’ll still get the formula in the output.

It also can time multiple areas in one pass. So if I select that same range as a non-contiguous selection by holding Ctrl down and clicking each cell as I’ve done here (not that it’s easy to tell the difference visually from the previous screenshot):
…then here’s what I get:
Output 2
Man, that is sooo much better than having to do each formula separately and then having to manually copy the results from a messagebox into a Table, like I used to do.

As you can see, I put a a databar on the important column, so you can visually eyeball results instead of conceptually juggling scientific notation in your head. But I’m damned if I can get this to display exactly as I want via VBA. For instance, here’s the databars I want if I add them manually:
Nice Databars

Notice that those have nice borders, and sensible setting for the minimum values, meaning that first result also gets a databar. The code that VBA spits out when you add this default databar is pretty ugly:

Selection.FormatConditions(Selection.FormatConditions.Count).ShowValue = True
With Selection.FormatConditions(1)
.MinPoint.Modify newtype:=xlConditionValueAutomaticMin
.MaxPoint.Modify newtype:=xlConditionValueAutomaticMax
End With
With Selection.FormatConditions(1).BarColor
.Color = 13012579
.TintAndShade = 0
End With
Selection.FormatConditions(1).BarFillType = xlDataBarFillGradient
Selection.FormatConditions(1).Direction = xlContext
Selection.FormatConditions(1).NegativeBarFormat.ColorType = xlDataBarColor
Selection.FormatConditions(1).BarBorder.Type = xlDataBarBorderSolid
Selection.FormatConditions(1).NegativeBarFormat.BorderColorType = _
With Selection.FormatConditions(1).BarBorder.Color
.Color = 13012579
.TintAndShade = 0
End With
Selection.FormatConditions(1).AxisPosition = xlDataBarAxisAutomatic
With Selection.FormatConditions(1).AxisColor
.Color = 0
.TintAndShade = 0
End With
With Selection.FormatConditions(1).NegativeBarFormat.Color
.Color = 255
.TintAndShade = 0
End With
With Selection.FormatConditions(1).NegativeBarFormat.BorderColor
.Color = 255
.TintAndShade = 0
End With

My code is just doing the first line:

'Add DataBars to the Each Cell column for easier comparison
lo.ListColumns("Each Cell (sec)").Range.FormatConditions.AddDatabar

…because no matter what I try, doing anything beyond merely adding the bars causes the code to error out. For instance, even if I just try and set the minpoint and maxpoint I get an error:
error 1
…and this successfully adds the min setting I want, but errors out when I try to add a listrow:
error 2
Even worse, when I end the routine, the screen no longer updates no matter what I do. So I have to close out of Excel entirely.

If anyone can tell me where I’m going wrong, I’d be much obliged. Might be another peculiarity of Excel Tables. Meanwhile, I’ll just run with those simple bars.

Here’s my draft code:

Option Explicit

Public Declare Function QueryPerformanceFrequency Lib "kernel32" _
(ByRef freq As Currency) As Long
Public Declare Function QueryPerformanceCounter Lib "kernel32" _
(ByRef cnt As Currency) As Long

'Code adapted from http://www.mrexcel.com/forum/excel-questions/762910-speed-performance-measure-visual-basic-applications-function.html
' Description: Determines formusa execution time
' Programmer: Jeff Weir
' Contact: excelforsuperheroes@gmail.com

' Name/Version: Date: Ini: Modification:
' TimeFormula 20150426 JSW Added in ability to record times to ListObject

Sub TimeFormula()
Dim sc As Currency
Dim ec As Currency
Dim dt As Double
Dim sMsg As String
Dim sResults As String
Dim i As Long
Dim N As Long
Dim oldCalc As Variant
Dim myRng As Range
Dim lo As ListObject
Dim lr As ListRow
Dim bUnique As Boolean
Dim strFormula As String
Dim myArea As Range
Dim lngArea As Long
Dim ws As Worksheet
Dim wsOriginal As Worksheet
Dim bNewListObject As Boolean
Dim lngAreas As Long
Dim varResults As Variant
Dim varMsg As Variant
Dim fc As FormatCondition

Const passes As Long = 10

With Application
.ScreenUpdating = False
.EnableEvents = False
oldCalc = .Calculation
.Calculation = xlCalculationManual
End With

Set myArea = Selection
lngAreas = myArea.Areas.Count
Set wsOriginal = myArea.Worksheet
ReDim varResults(1 To lngAreas, 1 To 6)
For Each myArea In Selection.Areas
lngArea = lngArea + 1
dt = 0
Set myRng = myArea
If myRng.Rows.Count = 1 Then
If Not IsEmpty(myRng.Cells(1).Offset(1)) Then Set myRng = Range(myRng, myRng.End(xlDown))
End If
N = myRng.Count
If myRng.Cells.Count > 1 Then
'Get formula from 2nd row in case we're dealing with multiple cells and happen to be on a header
If myRng.Cells(2).HasFormula Then strFormula = myRng.Cells(1).Formula
If myRng.Cells(2).HasArray Then strFormula = myRng.Cells(1).HasArray
End If

If myRng.Cells(1).HasFormula Then strFormula = myRng.Cells(1).Formula
If myRng.Cells(1).HasArray Then strFormula = myRng.Cells(1).HasArray

With myRng
For i = 1 To passes
sc = myTimer
ec = myTimer
dt = dt + myElapsedTime(ec - sc)

'Record results for this pass
varResults(lngArea, 1) = myRng.Address
If strFormula <> "" Then varResults(lngArea, 2) = "'" & strFormula
varResults(lngArea, 3) = N
varResults(lngArea, 4) = dt / passes
varResults(lngArea, 5) = dt / N / passes
varResults(lngArea, 6) = Now
End With


bNewListObject = True
For Each ws In ActiveWorkbook.Worksheets
For Each lo In ws.ListObjects
If lo.Name = "appTimeFormulas" Then
bNewListObject = False
Exit For
End If

If bNewListObject Then
Set ws = ActiveWorkbook.Worksheets.Add
On Error Resume Next
ws.Name = "TimeFormula"
On Error GoTo 0
Range("A1").Value = "Range"
Range("B1").Value = "Formula"
Range("C1").Value = "Count"
Range("D1").Value = "Entire Range (sec)"
Range("E1").Value = "Each Cell (sec)"
Range("F1").Value = "TimeStamp"
Set lo = ws.ListObjects.Add(xlSrcRange, Range("A1").CurrentRegion, , xlYes)
lo.Name = "appTimeFormulas"

'Add DataBars to the Each Cell column for easier comparison
lo.ListColumns("Each Cell (sec)").Range.FormatConditions.AddDatabar

Else: Set lo = ActiveSheet.ListObjects("appTimeFormulas")
End If

Set lr = lo.ListRows.Add
lr.Range.Resize(lngAreas).Value = varResults
With lo.ListColumns("Formula").Range
If .ColumnWidth > 30 Then
.ColumnWidth = 30
.WrapText = True
End If
End With

With Application
.EnableEvents = True
.Calculation = oldCalc
.ScreenUpdating = True
End With

sMsg = "Here are the average timings for the selected range over " & passes & " passes "
sMsg = sMsg & vbNewLine & vbNewLine
sMsg = sMsg & "Note that timings include some overhead incurred during the actual measurement process itself. "
sMsg = sMsg & "So if the functions you are tring to time are really really fast, then it's possible that "
sMsg = sMsg & "the measurement time included in the above result dwarfs the "
sMsg = sMsg & "actual recalculation time of the formulas themselves."
sMsg = sMsg & vbNewLine & vbNewLine
sMsg = sMsg & "For best results, either time the functions over a really big range (hundreds "
sMsg = sMsg & "of rows or more) or increase the size of the ranges that the formulas "
sMsg = sMsg & "refer to. Furthermore, pay more heed to the average per-formula time than the overall time when "
sMsg = sMsg & "making comparisons with other formulas."
sMsg = sMsg & vbNewLine & vbNewLine
sMsg = sMsg & "Do you want to return to the formulas, or stay in the result sheet?"
sMsg = sMsg & vbNewLine & vbNewLine
sMsg = sMsg & "(Press YES to return to formulas, and NO to stay in this results sheet.)"

varMsg = MsgBox(Prompt:=sMsg, Title:="Recalculation time for selection:", Buttons:=vbYesNo)
If varMsg = vbYes Then wsOriginal.Activate

End Sub

Function myTimer() As Currency
' defer conversion to seconds until myElapsedTime
QueryPerformanceCounter myTimer
End Function

Function myElapsedTime(dc As Currency) As Double ' return seconds
Static df As Double
Dim freq As Currency
If df = 0 Then QueryPerformanceFrequency freq: df = freq
myElapsedTime = dc / df
End Function

How much faster is the double-VLOOKUP trick?

Quick post. I was writing up the Double-VLOOKUP trick I learnt from Charles Williams for the book.

Standard VLOOKUP on unsorted data:

Double VLOOKUP trick on sorted data:

The point of the double VLOOKUP trick is this:

  • Standard VLOOKUPS on unsorted data are slow, because your VLOOKUP has to look at each item in turn until it finds a match. So on average, it looks at – and discounts – half the things in your lookup list before it finds that match.
  • Binary searches are lightning fast. Because your data is sorted, they can start half way through the lookup list, and check if the item at that point is bigger or smaller than what they’re looking for. Meaning they can ditch half the list immediately, then look halfway through the remainder. And over and over, ditching half the list each time until they either find the item they are looking for, or rule out all items.
  • VLOOKUP and MATCH will quite happily do a binary search for you. But for reasons known only to Microsoft, they offer an exciting plot-twist: if they don’t find what you’re looking for in the list, they return the closest match they can find to it, which happens to be the only thing left in the list when they’d divided it in half enough times. Only they don’t tell you its not an exact match. Phooey.
  • Charles’ brilliant trick is to do two lightning-fast Binary searches – the first one simply looks for the closest match to your input term among the Lookup terms. If it’s an exact match with what you fed it, you know your lookup term is in the list. So now that you KNOW it’s there for sure, you kick off a second approximate match VLOOKUP, which will grab the corresponding value you want from the lookup table. Go read his blog for the specifics.

I’ve known about this for a while, but it’s only as I’m writing this up for the book that I’ve gained an appeciation of just how much faster Binary Searches – and the Double VLOOKUP trick that gets around Microsoft’s crap implementation of them – are, compared to unsorted/linear VLOOKUPs.

See for yourself:
Double VLOOKUPv2
That says that:

  • At one extreme, if your lookup table has 10,000 things in it, the double VLOOKUP trick on sorted data is 28 times faster than the standard VLOOKUP on unsorted data
  • At the other, if your lookup table has 1,000,000 things in it, the double VLOOKUP trick on sorted data is 3,600 times faster than the standard VLOOKUP on unsorted data

Kinda puts the ‘hassle’ of sorting your lookup table ascending into perspective, don’t it!

April Fools, Excel-style.

Thought I’d share my two favorite pranks with you.

Number one: Take a screenshot of an MVP from their own website, subtly change it somehow, then email it back to them saying “Did you really say this, or was your site hacked”.

Here’s an example. Spot the original.
Jon Originaljon

Number two: Take a screenshot of someone’s spreadsheet next time they walk away from their desk, then paste it neatly over the real thing – like this one that I’m in the process of doing:



Hopefully you’ll catch them before they quit Excel forcibly using End Task. (But don’t worry if you don’t…they’ll be none the wiser.)

My only problem is that I’m forced to play this last prank on myself, which kinda ruins the surprise. But I’ve still got that first one to get me through.

Any new Excel-related April Fools pranks out there from anyone? I still have a chapter to write of my Evil Genius book on arrays or something unimportant like that, but I’m running out of steam. So I’ll just put your nastiest pranks in there instead. That outta help folk out with career progression, one way or the other…

I want a global feed of them there comments

I wish more Excel blogs had a global site-wide comments feed that you could subscribe to, like this one does. (Daily Dose of Excel: http://www.dailydoseofexcel.com/comments/feed/)

Comments are where the party is. Sure, you can subscribe to comments on blogs post by post, but sometimes the article doesn’t seem that relevant to you at the time, so you don’t bother. And then someone posts some gem that you wished you had known about. And you missed it, because it wasn’t in the original piece.

And on a site like this one that predates my interest in Excel by like over a decade, I find comments from the Comment Feed often alert me to helpful stuff I’ve missed. But retrospectively subscribing one post at a time in order to catch them ain’t a serious option. So a global comments feed is one of the handiest ways for people to consume great content – often NOT written by the original author – for years to come.

Here’s the site-wide comments feeds for the main sites I know about that have ’em:
Chandoo: http://feeds2.feedburner.com/CommentsForPointyHairedDilbert-Chandoo
Contextures: http://feeds.feedburner.com/ContexturesBlogComments
ExcelXOR: http://excelxor.com/comments/feed/
Newton Excel Bach: http://newtonexcelbach.wordpress.com/comments/feed/
Bacon Bits: http://feeds.feedburner.com/CommentsForBaconBits
PowerPivotPro: http://www.powerpivotpro.com/comments/feed/
Excel & UDF Performance (Charles Williams): http://fastexcel.wordpress.com/comments/feed/
YourSumBuddy: http://yoursumbuddy.com/comments/feed/
MyOnlineTrainingHub (Mynda Treacy): http://www.myonlinetraininghub.com/comments/feed
Jon Peltier: http://feeds.feedburner.com/CommentsForPtsBlog
RAD Excel (Colin Legg): http://feeds.feedburner.com/CommentsForRadExcel
Andrew’s Excel Tips: http://andrewexcel.blogspot.com/feeds/comments/default

My favorite used to be the Bacon Bits comments feed: most of those comments were as risque as Mike’ articles. But then he had to go spoil things by adding a spam filter.

Ah well…the Captcha almost makes up for it:
Bacon Bits Captcha

Anyone else have any great global comments feeds on the main Excel sites out there worth sharing?